Todd Achilles is running for U.S. Senate as an Independent in a state where most races are decided long before November.
Idaho does not typically reward political experiments. Republicans dominate statewide offices, and incumbents usually hold. Achilles knows that. His bet is that frustration over affordability, healthcare costs, housing, and trust in institutions may be deeper than party loyalty.
Achilles’ background shapes how he frames the race. He grew up on a farm, served as an Army officer, spent more than two decades in tech leadership, taught public policy, and served in the Idaho Legislature. He talks less about ideology and more about systems stop serving the people they were built for.
In our conversation, Achilles argues that both major parties have grown comfortable with concentrated economic power. He questions whether markets are as competitive as advertised and whether public policy often protects consolidation instead of challenging it.
That shows up in healthcare, where he says coverage expanded under the Affordable Care Act but market concentration deepened. It shows up in housing, where algorithm driven pricing tools are shaping rents in ways most renters never see. It shows up in federal spending, where the national debt has climbed from roughly $10 trillion in 2009 to more than $38 trillion today.
He uses the phrase “corporate socialism” to describe large employers shifting costs onto taxpayers while maintaining profits. Whether voters agree with that framing is up to them. But the concern about affordability is not theoretical in Idaho. It shows up in premiums, rent payments, and childcare bills.
Achilles has signed a two term pledge. He argues that campaign finance and concentrated political spending distort representation. He is asking voters to judge performance, not party.
Independent campaigns face steep odds here. Party infrastructure is real. Voting habits are durable. But so is frustration over cost of living.
This episode does not tell you what to think. It lays out how Achilles sees the system and why he believes it is drifting away from ordinary Idahoans. Whether that argument can translate into votes is uncertain, but whether Idahoans are asking harder questions about markets, power, and representation is not.
About the Author
Gregory Graf is the creator of Political Potatoes and a lifelong conservative Republican living in Star, Idaho.
Do you want to help support Political Potatoes? Please consider upgrading to a paid subscription and/or leave a tip 😊 Your support keeps this work going and is appreciated.
Disclaimer
The following is intended to convey an opinion on newsworthy events of public concern regarding public figures and/or public officials in exercising their official duties. No implications or inferences—beyond those explicitly stated in the preceding— are intended to be conveyed or endorsed by the Author. Wherever available, hyperlinks have been provided to allow readers to directly access any underlying assertions of fact upon which this opinion is based.
